DECISION NO. 2002A005-136
Date: September 25, 2002
The issue before the tribunal was a residential building that was found by the fire department to be unsafe for occupancy. The fire department ordered that the owner close the property immediately, until a list of fire safety deficiencies have been corrected. The Order to Close the building was approved by the Fire Marshal as required by the Fire Protection and Prevention Act. The owner appealed the Order to Close and the matter was referred to the Fire Safety Commission.
The building is three storeys (plus basement) in height, is of
combustible construction and has a building area of 69 m2.
There is an enclosed front porch on the north side of the building with a
floor area of 10 m2.
The basement contains a furnace room and the owner’s apartment. The first
floor has a kitchen and two living rooms. A main entrance vestibule is also
located on the first floor and provides access to all floors. The second
floor has three bedrooms and one washroom. The third floor has two bedrooms
and one washroom. The building was vacant at the time of inspection due to a
previous fire. It was alleged to have been used as a rooming, boarding and
lodging facility. The five bedrooms on the second and third floors could
accommodate up to five tenants.
A centrally located exit stair provides access to the second and third
floors from the ground floor main entrance vestibule. This stair is
contiguous to the corridors on the first, second and third floors. A
separate stair serves as an exit from the first floor and basement. A third
exit from the first floor is also available through an exterior door in the
kitchen.
An electrically powered interconnected smoke alarm system is provided
throughout the building, but is inoperative.
The owner claimed that Section 9.3 and 9.5 should not apply to his building, as there are never more than three persons occupying the property.
The owner has vacated the building and has completed some of the conditions as set out in the Order to Close.
The fire department identified the building as unsafe and that it be
closed immediately for the following reasons:
The building is closed until the following conditions be complied with:
The Commission ruled that the Order to Close be upheld.
The tribunal believes that the property was occupied as a boarding,
lodging and rooming house as defined in Section 9.3 of the Ontario Fire
Code. It was evidenced that at the time of the inspections, lodging was
provided for more than three persons in return for remuneration or the
provision of services or both.
The tribunal also believes that the public is entitled to a minimum level of
fire safety in any building in the province of Ontario.