blank space

APPENDIX B

CASE STUDY

MOUNTAIN DRUM SALES INC.

48 SLUSE RD.

(HOLLAND LANDING)

TOWN OF
EAST GWILLIMBURY

March 24, 1998


INTRODUCTION

This case study illustrates the enforcement steps, and costs to do work at the buildings and premises where flammable and combustible liquids and hazardous liquids were stored in abandoned and poorly secured buildings in proximity to a sizable community and important vegetable growing region for the province.

BACKGROUND

The buildings and premises consisted of a group of five separated buildings and surrounding grounds that had originally supported a vegetable storage and packaging operation. The produce was obtained from neighboring marsh gardens spreading several miles in a generally westerly direction. These operations ceased and the buildings became filled with various industrial and commercial operations.

One building (known as building #5) was occupied for the purposes of a drum cleaning operation by a tenant that was eventually known as Mountain Drum Sales Inc. The tenant received a Certificate of Approval to operate a waste disposal site (processing) on May 4, 1994. The Certificate of Approval from the Ministry of Environment allowed for the cleaning and restoration of drums in building #5 with the regular withdrawal of waste chemical from the site for treatment.

The tenant stopped operations on December 11, 1995 after being evicted by a bailiff. Empty drums and containers of waste products remained in building #5 and on adjacent grounds to the building.

During July, 1996, citizens in the neighborhood complained of a strong natural gas smell coming from the property. Subsequent investigation by MOE and the fire department revealed leaking cylinders containing mercaptan (a powerful odorant added to natural gas to provide warning of its presence). These cylinders were moved into building #5 for protection from the weather and from children that had ready access to the yards. At this time, a considerable number of containers were discovered in nearby building #3. It was believed that these cylinders contained only the caustic cleaning solution and residue left over from the cleaning operation in building #5. The by-law enforcement officer for the Town of East Gwillimbury was called in to lock the doors of building #3 to ensure that children could not get in and that additional unwanted drums would not be deposited there. On March, 1997, another mercaptan release occurred within building #5 from unknown causes and the fire department sought the assistance of the Fire Marshals Office to determine the risk to public safety and the natural environment posed by the contents of buildings #3 & 5 if a fire should occur there.

Due to the lack of security for the buildings and premises, the quantities of hazardous, and flammable and combustible liquids in proximity to people and the natural environment, the Fire Department issued Fire Marshal's Orders against the tenant and property owner.

In the final tally after the cleanup, there were 3,808 drums, 2,300 of which were empty and 1,508 that were filled with solvents and oils. There were 116 totes, of which 86 contained pesticides. Clearly, a fire in the partially combustible buildings that involved the contents of the drums would have had a significant impact on the neighboring environment and public safety.

ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS BY THE TOWN OF EAST GWILLIMBURY

On April 11th and April 15th, 1997, similarly worded Fire Marshal's Orders were served by the Fire Department against the tenant (Mountain Drum Sales Inc.) and the property owner (Willbeck Corporation). These orders required the following items to be complied with by April 25, 1997:

  1. Repair doors to operating condition. Close and lock the doors to prevent unauthorized entry.

  2. Remove all combustible and hazardous materials from the buildings and open areas in a safe manner.

  3. Remove combustible waste and debris.

The owner responded verbally to the Fire Department that he would not be appealing the order nor would he bring the property into compliance with the order. Apparently the bank which held the mortgage on the property had given notice to the owner that they intended foreclose on the property on April 29, 1997. Additionally the property was several hundred thousand dollars in arrears on property taxes.

The order sent to the tenant by registered mail was returned to the Town by the postal service as undeliverable.

The Town of East Gwillimbury Fire Department requested on May 1, 1997 a hearing before the Fire Safety Commission to obtain authorization to do work at the site. The hearing was held on June 3, 1997 where evidence from the Town of East Gwillimbury, MOE and staff from the Fire Marshal's Office was presented before the Commission while the owner failed to make an appearance.

The Fire Safety Commission stated: "It is unacceptable for a property owner or tenant to subject nearby residents and firefighters to an undue fire hazard. The evidence has shown, it is unlikely that the owner or tenant will control access to the building, and considering the resources of the fire department, the conditions at the subject property could result in a fire which would endanger the safety of residents of the community and firefighters. Furthermore, a fire could impair the quality of the natural environment. Therefore, the conditions shall be corrected in a timely manner."

The commission decision was the following:

  1. Secure the site against vandalism and the deposit of additional waste.

  2. Implement a plan for the orderly removal of all products and materials located on the subject property, including drums/totes and their contents, and contents of the aboveground storage tanks, bulk tanker trailer, the plastic waste and other refuse. Planning be reviewed with and accepted by the Ministry of Environment by September 1, 1997.

  3. Complete the work mentioned in Item no. 2, by December 1, 1997.


WORK DONE AND COST

The Town of East Gwillimbury proceeded to obtain tenders for removal of stored chemicals and their containers. The removal of containers and product commenced the last week of August, 1997 and continued for two weeks under a "warrant to enter" granted by a local justice of the peace. The cylinders contaminated with mercaptan created unusual disposal problems and were returned to the property from an Ontario waste transfer station when an accidental odor release occurred. The cylinders were eventually shipped to a waste handling facility in Wisconsin, USA.

Costing analysis that was performed by the Town of East Gwillimbury was based on estimates of the number of containers present at the facilities and information that was provided to them on the contents of the containers.

The drums and large capacity totes were stored up to three drums high without aisles in 1/3 of building #3 floor area which Mountain Drum Sales Inc. had occupied. Two additional mercaptan cylinders and numerous additional totes filled with pesticides had been stored inconspicuously beneath drums at the rear of the storage area.

Information provided by the tenant to MOE concerning its drum cleaning operations indicated that the waste residue from the plant operation was caustic cleaning solution and the residue from "empty drums". From these estimates, the Town of East Gwillimbury anticipated costs in the range of $100,000 to $150,000. The Fire Chief stated that the cost to cleanup the site at 48 Sluse Rd was $344,585.00 and that instead of caustic wash which would have been relatively less expensive to dispose of, the drums and totes contained solvents, oils and pesticides.

COST RECOVERY

The municipality will attempt to recover its costs in having the tanks, totes and drums and their contents removed from the property. The property is presently in tax arrears to the amount of $445,000.00 and the owner of record has abandoned claim to the property. The affected financial institution had been willing to pay $50,000.00 toward the costs for cleanup after the property had been sold but has since backed out from that offer. This financial institution estimated their loss on the property was nearly $1,000,000.00 in consideration of failure to repay the mortgage by the owner, ground environmental auditing costs and lost of interest on their money.

The Town of East Gwillimbury under powers provided by the Fire Protection and Prevention Act, 1997 placed a lien on the property for cleanup costs. The town is currently in the process of taking possession of the property for the purpose of selling it to pay for outstanding back taxes and cleanup. Town officials have also met with the MOE officials for the purpose of obtaining their assistance. This request is currently under consideration.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. Operations of this type are very labour intensive for a volunteer fire department.

  2. Cleanup costs at this site have proven to be expensive and onerous for this small municipality.

  3. The public and the environment where put at risk for a considerable period of time.

  4. The owner operated an illegal site, misled government officials and likely profited from the operation.

  5. The volunteer fire department did not have the technical capabilities to assess this site, thus, they relied on the Ontario Fire Marshals Office to perform this task.

Next Back